宽容二字，常被人误读，有人将其当作弱者的妥协，便觉得其人软弱可欺；有人将其当作金钟罩，当作对别人的道德绑架。口出恶言，反复横跳，别人反手一击，他就说别人没雅量；行事张扬不顾他人感受，碰壁后抱怨世人心胸狭隘；不断侵害公司、公众与公家利益，被识破被抓了后，却要求宽大处理……在这些人的眼里，宽容是别人必须履行的义务、理应具备的道德，而自己肆意妄为，却是天经地义的权利。夫妻之间，一方任性妄为、口无遮拦，却要求对方无限包容；朋友之间，一方自私自利、得寸进尺，却要求对方不要“斤斤计较”；职场之上，一方傲慢无礼、无端挑衅，却要求同事胸怀宽广、格局打开……世间最讽刺的关系，莫过于我要求你宽容，我却从不收敛。
这就像陶艺转盘。你定义好一个侧面的轮廓线，它旋转一圈就变成了一个罐子。
，更多细节参见heLLoword翻译官方下载
How is a user supposed to understand that they are potentially blowing away photos of deceased relatives, an encrypted property deed, or their digital currency?。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法下载作为进阶阅读
Что думаешь? Оцени!
Testing LLM reasoning abilities with SAT is not an original idea; there is a recent research that did a thorough testing with models such as GPT-4o and found that for hard enough problems, every model degrades to random guessing. But I couldn't find any research that used newer models like I used. It would be nice to see a more thorough testing done again with newer models.